In a digital age where social media can amplify voices and expose hidden truths, a disturbing narrative has emerged from the shadows of the music industry. It tells the story of a young man, then just 16, who bravely tried to shed light on what he saw as alarming behavior by rising artist D4VD in 2023, only to have his efforts met with the full force of alleged legal threats and professional suppression. This chilling account raises serious questions about accountability, the vulnerability of young accusers, and the power dynamics at play when accusations surface against well-connected figures.

The individual at the center of this unfolding drama is Ingleazy, a name now circulating on platforms like X as he re-emerges with claims that he tried to expose D4VD more than a year ago. A former fan who even collaborated on a song with D4VD, Ingleazy’s perspective offers a unique look into the alleged attempts to silence his early warnings. He states that his 2023 allegations concerned “other underage girls,” separate from more recent controversies.

Ingleazy’s claims began within D4VD’s Discord server, where he says he observed a pattern of “suspicious behavior.” He noticed D4VD allegedly interacting with and adding “underage girls” to his server. Ingleazy has provided screenshots from March 2023 showing conversations where he and other users expressed concern over D4VD talking to girls as young as 15 or 16. At the time, Ingleazy referred to the artist using a highly derogatory term, indicating his alarm.

Ingleazy’s attempts to bring these concerns to light were, he says, met with significant resistance and alleged intimidation. He claims D4VD’s legal team directly contacted him, threatening legal action if he didn’t stop spreading this information. This pressure allegedly included the removal of their collaborative song from streaming services. D4VD himself reportedly denied the allegations, dismissing them as “false information” and “people trying to get clout.” For a 16-year-old with no legal resources, facing the combined force of an artist, a legal team, and a major label proved overwhelming. Ingleazy says he was “petrified,” fearing legal repercussions for himself and his family, which led him to retract his public statements and remain silent.

Ingleazy’s narrative suggests he wasn’t the only one allegedly targeted for speaking out. He provided a screenshot of Discord messages from D4VD himself, discussing another user named Lamp who also tried to “expose David.” In these messages, D4VD allegedly threatened a lawsuit for “$30,000,” stating, “our legal team is going bonkers right now.” This detail suggests a concerted effort by D4VD and his team to actively “smother” these accusations from multiple sources.

Ingleazy’s decision to break his silence now, over a year later, comes from his realization that his claims were not false. His story serves as a stark reminder of the challenges in holding powerful individuals accountable. It exposes the alleged tactics used to silence accusers and control information, especially when minors are involved. This case highlights the urgent need for robust mechanisms to protect vulnerable voices and ensure that justice is not silenced by power.