The tragic discovery of Celeste Rivas Hernandez’s body in a Tesla Model X, reportedly belonging to musician D4vd, continues to unravel with unsettling new details. Recent photographs of the impounded vehicle have surfaced, revealing significant and perplexing damage that has ignited a firestorm of speculation and raised urgent questions about the circumstances surrounding Celeste’s untimely death. These images, combined with official reports and a detailed timeline of events, paint a grim picture that challenges prevailing narratives and pushes investigators—and the public—to confront the chilling realities of this deeply disturbing case.

The Tesla Model X, a luxury electric vehicle, was initially impounded after an abandoned vehicle complaint on August 26, 2025. What was initially reported as a rear dent, according to the caller, has now been exposed as far more extensive. Steve Fischer, an investigative reporter, secured these critical photographs along with the tow report, which meticulously details the vehicle’s journey from abandonment to impoundment. The caller’s initial complaint mentioned only a “rear dent” and notably “no odor,” an omission that would later become a point of intense scrutiny given the grim discovery made within the car.

Upon closer examination of the newly released photos, the damage to the Model X is alarming. A substantial portion of the car’s left rear appears to be “swiped,” with a significant chunk of the body “literally not there.” Furthermore, the rear spoiler is visibly taped up, appearing as if it had been split in half and crudely reattached. This suggests a forceful impact or severe structural compromise. The large dent on the back, previously noted, now appears colossal, leading many to question if this damage is merely coincidental or intrinsically linked to Celeste’s death. The stark contrast between the initial, seemingly minor complaint and the shocking extent of the damage depicted in the photos is a critical point of concern. This level of impact suggests a violent event, perhaps a collision or an altercation, which could hold significant clues to the final moments leading up to Celeste’s demise.

The timeline of the Tesla’s abandonment and impoundment further complicates the narrative. The initial complaint was lodged on August 26. An officer first inspected and cited the car on August 27, followed by a second citation on September 3. This indicates the vehicle remained stationary for an extended period, suggesting deliberate abandonment rather than a momentary停车 mishap. Finally, the car was towed and impounded on September 5. The report also explicitly states that there were “no wants on the vehicle,” confirming it was not reported stolen at the time of its recovery, directly refuting earlier misinformation circulating online. This detail is crucial, as it implies the owner, or someone with access, chose to leave the vehicle.

A particularly disturbing aspect of the case revolves around the location of the abandoned vehicle. While the car was found on Bluebird Avenue, D4vd’s rental property was on Dhini Drive. Although these addresses sound distinct, they are reportedly less than 100 feet apart. This proximity raises questions about why the car was left on a public street for days, drawing official attention, rather than being discreetly moved to a private residence. Such an oversight or intentional act, given the gravity of what was later found inside, is a significant point of investigation.

The video also touches upon the police’s search efforts, revealing that the LAPD obtained a search warrant to look for blood evidence inside the residence where D4vd was reportedly staying. This suggests that law enforcement suspects Celeste might have been killed inside the home, rather than in the vehicle itself. Furthermore, it has been reported that D4vd has officially moved out of the home, breaking his lease, a decision that makes sense given the public exposure of the address. The landlord, it’s noted, only knew D4vd’s manager, who signed the lease for a staggering $20,000 per month, highlighting the high stakes and private nature of the property.

Amidst the official reports and photographic evidence, a torrent of misinformation has plagued the case, adding layers of confusion and distress. One persistent rumor suggested that D4vd had reported his car stolen, a claim definitively debunked by the impound report. Another baseless rumor circulated about the discovery of infant remains in the car, which has also been disproven by official records, confirming no infant fatalities were reported in LA County during that period. The video explicitly states that Celeste was not pregnant, putting an end to this particularly egregious falsehood.

A key point of contention has been the cause and manner of Celeste’s death. With no homicide charges filed yet, one possibility being considered is that Celeste suffered an overdose, and those present panicked, subsequently concealing the body to protect D4vd. Such an act would constitute abuse of a corpse and concealment of an accidental death, rather than homicide. The official determination of the cause of death is pending toxicology results, which can take anywhere from 60 to 120 days, leaving a critical void in understanding the precise circumstances of her passing.

The initial police description of the deceased prior to official identification further illuminates the state of the body upon discovery. It was noted that the decedent was “found severely decomposed inside a vehicle” and appeared to have been deceased for an “extended period of time.” The description mentioned her wearing a tube top and black leggings, along with specific jewelry, including yellow metal stud earrings and a yellow metal chain bracelet. Crucially, the description provided details about her wavy black hair, height (5’2″), and weight (71 lbs), along with a distinctive finger tattoo.

This level of detail about clothing, jewelry, and physical attributes, particularly her height, strongly suggests that the body was largely intact, dispelling earlier, sensationalized rumors of dismemberment that circulated widely, largely fueled by unverified smaller websites and then amplified by outlets like TMZ. The video clarifies that what might have been misinterpreted as dismemberment was more likely “disarticulation,” a natural process during advanced decomposition where connective tissues decay, causing limbs to naturally detach but still remain present with the body.

The size of the Tesla Model X’s front trunk (frunk) also became a point of discussion. Initially, the idea of a body being concealed in a frunk seemed impossible to many, given the typically smaller size of such compartments in other Tesla models. However, it was revealed that the Model X boasts a surprisingly large frunk, capable of accommodating a person, thereby validating the possibility of concealment within that space. This detail, though morbid, is important for understanding the logistics of the discovery.

Another critical piece of information involves Celeste’s age and background. It was mentioned that Celeste was on Discord at 11 years old and got a tattoo at age 13. California law requires parental consent for minors to get tattoos, implying she obtained it without permission, highlighting a pattern of independent or unsupervised behavior. Her mother reportedly hadn’t seen her in a year, though she was able to help identify Celeste using knowledge of a distinctive tattoo. This raises questions about the timeline of their last contact and the nature of their relationship. The video also cites sources suggesting the last known contact anyone had with Celeste was in July, making the August 26 discovery even more chilling.

The role of media outlets like TMZ in disseminating both accurate and potentially misleading information is also brought into focus. While TMZ reported that Celeste used multiple fake IDs to appear older, suggesting D4vd might not have known her true age, the video’s narrator expresses strong doubt about this claim. It’s argued that if Celeste was reportedly living with D4vd at some point, it’s highly improbable he wouldn’t have known her age. This highlights the ongoing challenge of separating verified facts from speculative narratives in high-profile cases.

In conclusion, the new photographic evidence of D4vd’s damaged Tesla Model X has thrust the Celeste Rivas Hernandez case into an even more intense spotlight. The extensive damage, the detailed timeline of the car’s abandonment, and the ongoing investigation into the circumstances of Celeste’s death collectively paint a picture of profound tragedy and unresolved mysteries. As the wait for toxicology results continues, the public, along with law enforcement, grapples with a complex web of facts, rumors, and heart-wrenching questions, all pointing to a crime that absolutely happened here, demanding answers and justice for Celeste.