The unfolding tragedy surrounding the death of Celeste Rivas Hernandez and its alleged connection to musician D4VD has taken a dramatic turn, now placing D4VD’s manager, Josh Marshall, squarely in the crosshairs of public and investigative scrutiny. Marshall has recently broken his silence, issuing a statement that, far from clarifying matters, has only intensified suspicions and raised more questions than answers. His desperate attempt to distance himself from the deepening investigation has been met with skepticism, especially given the gravity of the allegations: a long-term relationship between D4VD and a minor, and the grim discovery of Celeste’s remains.

Marshall’s meticulously worded statement emerged not in traditional media, but in the comment section of a TikTok video posted by user “Girl Town.” This video alleged that Marshall received an email in February 2024 regarding Celeste’s missing person’s report and further claimed that Marshall and D4VD were roommates. The user also referenced Daily Mail reports suggesting Marshall had to move his and D4VD’s belongings, reinforcing the roommate narrative. It’s a striking choice of platform for such a critical response, immediately signaling a degree of damage control rather than transparent disclosure.

In his comment, Marshall stated, “This video is false and the person is misinformed. This is the only time I’ll speak on this matter for now. This has been a tough time for my family as well as I’m a father of three children.” He vehemently denied receiving any emails concerning Celeste, asserting, “I’ve received no emails and I’m no one’s roommate. I live full-time at home with my wife and kids. My daughter is 14 and this news is affecting so many lives. I’ve never received any emails. I had zero knowledge of anything and I don’t live in California. I work remotely 95% of the time and my job doesn’t require me to have much interaction with many of my clients like David, as there are many others who work with him on a day-to-day capacity, not me.” He concluded by calling the news “tragic” for Celeste’s family and expressing hope for authorities to get to the bottom of it, while reminding people that much of the information is “speculation and alleged.”

However, Marshall’s statement, intended to clear his name, is riddled with inconsistencies and raises significant red flags. His claim of minimal interaction with D4VD clashes sharply with the widely known fact that he is D4VD’s manager. If he’s not directly managing D4VD in a day-to-day capacity, the obvious question arises: who is? The lack of specific names for these “many others” only fuels further suspicion.

More glaringly, Marshall’s assertion that he “doesn’t live in California” and works remotely 95% of the time directly contradicts reports of a very expensive lease for a property in his name—reportedly a $20,000-a-month residence in California, a detail that simply doesn’t add up for someone claiming to be based elsewhere. This discrepancy alone casts a long shadow over the veracity of his entire statement.

The TikToker “Girl Town” provided a crucial piece of counter-evidence, alleging that a family friend of Celeste Rivas Hernandez explicitly sent an email to Josh Marshall, identifying him as D4VD’s manager and roommate, in February 2024. This email reportedly contained Celeste’s missing person’s report and stated, “We know Celeste is living with you guys. She needs to return home.” The TikToker further claimed that Celeste returned home one day after this email, only to go back to living with D4VD and Marshall a month later. If these allegations hold true, it would mean Marshall was undeniably aware of Celeste’s age and her status as a missing child, rendering his claims of “zero knowledge of anything” demonstrably false.

The emotional plea about his own family—a father of three, including a 14-year-old daughter—also rings hollow to many. If his interaction with D4VD was as minimal as he suggests, why would the news of this tragedy “uproot” and “upset” his family to such an extent? The implication is that his children, particularly his daughter, would only be so deeply affected if they had a close connection to D4VD, perhaps even having bragged about it at school, now leading to unwanted scrutiny—a scenario that aligns with a much closer relationship than Marshall admits.

Marshall made a second, more expansive comment, stating, “This is for anyone that has spread misinformation that greatly affects myself and my family without regard for the facts. I hope the creator of this video pins my comment and corrects what she said in a new video.” He then proceeded to tag numerous TikTokers, inadvertently providing a comprehensive list for those seeking more information on the evolving narrative. His preference for addressing such serious allegations in a TikTok comment section, rather than through traditional, formal channels, is highly unconventional and further diminishes his credibility in the eyes of many. The conspicuous silence from record labels and D4VD himself only amplifies the perception that keeping quiet is being utilized as a strategic defense, a tactic that often backfires in high-stakes public relations crises.

The complexities of Celeste’s case are harrowing. The autopsy report, which deferred the cause of death, has introduced significant hurdles for the investigation. The “extensive decomposition and mutilation of the corpse,” which was left for 11 days in August heat within the frunk of a Tesla, “introduces a high probability of inconclusive autopsy findings.” This level of decay severely compromises forensic analysis, making it difficult to ascertain critical details about her internal organs, soft tissue, and toxicology. With a body weight of 71 lbs suggesting “wasting or decomposition,” the path to a clear cause of death is obscured. If the cause of death is ultimately ruled undetermined, prosecutors will be forced to rely entirely on circumstantial evidence—D4VD’s car, their relationship, and any other tangential connections. This scenario, terrifyingly, creates a pathway for D4VD, armed with skilled legal counsel, to potentially evade justice.

Whispers from a TMZ live stream suggest the outlet possesses critical information they are not publicly disclosing. During a heated discussion about Celeste and D4VD, a panelist allegedly indicated “two theories that can substantiate with evidence,” yet this information was kept “off camera.” This perceived withholding of information, coupled with TMZ’s reported focus on videos that portray Celeste in a negative light, raises concerns about journalistic integrity and potential biases. Some online commenters have speculated that TMZ’s reluctance to fully report might stem from financial ties to D4VD’s legal team, suggesting a conflict of interest where their “paycheck” might be at stake.

The general sentiment online is one of profound confusion and frustration. Why, despite the horrific circumstances of Celeste’s death and the mounting allegations, has there been no arrest, no comprehensive update, or a transparent statement from D4VD or his representatives? The public senses that “something feels really off,” particularly if major media outlets are indeed withholding crucial information. This case, steeped in tragedy and shadowed by unanswered questions, demands transparency and a relentless pursuit of justice for Celeste Rivas Hernandez. The current narrative, shaped by evasive statements and fragmented disclosures, leaves a chilling impression that powerful forces might be at play, obscuring the truth behind a young girl’s tragic end.