Stephen A. Smith Exposes WNBA Bribery Attempt: Britney Griner Rumors Could Bring the League to Its Knees

The WNBA has long been a league of whispers, debates, and occasional controversy, but recent developments suggest the walls of secrecy may finally be crumbling. Stephen A. Smith, the inimitable sports commentator known for speaking his mind regardless of consequences, has reportedly been approached by the league with an offer many would find hard to believe: a payoff to remain silent about one of basketball’s most explosive rumors. At the center of it all? Britney Griner, the WNBA star whose talent, size, and controversial past have fueled speculation for years.

It’s a story that reads like a drama waiting to happen. Imagine this: a major sports network personality, clips going viral at the drop of a hat, sponsors watching every word, and a league scrambling to maintain its image. That’s the stage Stephen A. Smith finds himself on—and the WNBA may have just handed him the spotlight on a silver platter.

The details are eyebrow-raising. According to multiple reports, the league allegedly attempted to “quiet” Stephen A., hoping to prevent him from discussing the long-standing whispers about Griner’s gender. If true, this isn’t just a PR misstep—it’s potentially catastrophic for the WNBA. For years, fans have speculated online about Griner’s biological sex, pointing to her physique, strength, and dominance over the competition. Clips of her dunking with ease or overpowering defenders only serve to amplify these conversations. Reddit threads, TikTok videos, and sports podcasts regularly highlight this narrative, and many fans have accused the league of shielding her rather than addressing the speculation head-on.

Stephen A. doesn’t just wield influence; he creates it. Whenever he speaks, whether on ESPN, YouTube, or his podcast, millions tune in, NBA stars weigh in, and sponsors take notice. His recent criticisms of the WNBA have been blunt and unflinching. From calling out the league for allowing players to target rising star Caitlyn Clark to highlighting the jealousy and resentment simmering inside the locker room, he has positioned himself as a formidable voice in women’s basketball.

Clark, in particular, has transformed the league’s landscape almost overnight. Stephen A. notes that when she arrived in the WNBA, she was immediately responsible for meaningful improvements: chartered flights for players, a spike in attendance at Indiana Fever games, and higher television ratings for draft games on ABC and ESPN. Yet, despite all this, some players harbored resentment—not because of Clark herself, but because her presence amplified inequalities and exposed the league’s shortcomings.

“There was resentment towards her,” Stephen A. explains. “But it was misplaced. She hasn’t denied anyone else privileges; she’s lifted the tide for everyone.” In other words, Clark represents what a rising tide in sports should be: a player whose success benefits the league as a whole. Yet human nature being what it is, not everyone welcomes the disruption of the status quo, especially when it challenges long-held dynamics inside the league.

Then there’s Britney Griner. Far from a peripheral figure, Griner has been a lightning rod for controversy, both on and off the court. From rough fouls and cheap shots against Clark to a viral moment where she was caught using a racial slur, Griner’s actions have sparked outrage. But it’s not just behavior that fuels speculation; her very presence challenges norms and expectations in women’s sports. Her size, athleticism, and ability to dominate games have kept the rumors alive, despite the WNBA’s attempts to control the narrative.

Stephen A. has repeatedly hinted that the league is on the verge of a reckoning. Behind the scenes, players are reportedly frustrated with how the league handles everything—from discipline to public image protection. Many insiders believe the WNBA prioritizes shielding Griner over accountability, a perception that could erode trust among fans, players, and sponsors alike. In this climate, the timing of Stephen A.’s potential revelations becomes crucial. He hasn’t outright stated the rumors publicly, but he’s teased multiple times that the truth will eventually come out, leaving the league on tenterhooks.

The tension between Stephen A. and the WNBA isn’t new. His criticism dates back years, with high-profile clashes that have made headlines. On June 3, 2024, a heated debate with Monica McNut on First Take spotlighted resentment toward Caitlyn Clark. Critics questioned whether Stephen A. was genuinely advocating for the league or simply capitalizing on a trend, but he maintained his stance: Clark’s presence had improved conditions across the league, and resentment toward her was misguided.

Similarly, Stephen A. has gone head-to-head with WNBA legends. His late-2023 feud with Sue Bird erupted after she defended the league’s playoff ratings, claiming the WNBA was finally attracting viewers. Stephen A. called her take “disgusting” and insisted the league stop pretending its ratings were strong when they weren’t. These confrontations underscore his willingness to challenge both players and the league itself, showing he’s not afraid to hold anyone accountable.

Financial strain compounds the league’s precarious position. Even with Clark’s arrival and the attention she brings, the WNBA lost $40 million last year. Sponsors are increasingly scrutinizing the league’s stability, wary of the impact of repeated controversies. The pressure isn’t limited to money either: players are taking public action to express dissatisfaction. During this year’s All-Star weekend, the entire roster protested the league’s failure to address pay disparities, wearing shirts reading, “Pay us what you owe us.” Union leaders like Breanna Stewart and Natasha Cloud have publicly criticized the league’s offers as disrespectful, raising the specter of a potential lockout before the 2026 season.

Stephen A. has been careful, showing support for Griner when she returned from Russia, recognizing the mental health challenges she faced and resisting the urge to sensationalize her struggles. This restraint might have built credibility, but it also sets the stage for a dramatic moment. If another controversy arises involving Griner—another rough play, another public gaffe, or any action that can’t be easily explained—Stephen A. may decide the time has come to connect all the dots. When he does, the story won’t just affect the WNBA; it could implicate the NBA, ESPN, and Disney, which collectively have a vested interest in controlling the narrative.

Adam Silver and the NBA have maintained a close relationship with the WNBA, collaborating with team owners and league officials to ensure operations align with expectations. This integration means any scandal within the WNBA doesn’t remain isolated; it has broader implications for the professional basketball ecosystem. Stephen A., acutely aware of media dynamics, knows the risks of going public. Brands could abandon him, activists could turn the narrative, and the league could attempt to portray him as the villain. Yet the potential impact of revealing the truth outweighs these risks.

The WNBA stands at a crossroads. The league isn’t merely managing rumors about Griner; it’s grappling with internal dissent, player dissatisfaction, and financial instability. Each public controversy, from Griner’s actions to disputes over pay and working conditions, threatens to unravel the carefully curated image the league presents. If Stephen A. decides to reveal what he knows, the repercussions could be unprecedented. The WNBA would face scrutiny not just from the public but from investors, sponsors, and the broader sports world.

In the meantime, Stephen A. continues to play the long game. Teasing revelations, connecting dots, and waiting for the perfect moment, he exemplifies the media power that can topple narratives and expose hidden truths. Fans, players, and league officials alike are left wondering: when will he strike? And when he does, will the WNBA survive the fallout, or will it be forced to confront the rumors, protections, and internal dysfunctions that have plagued it for years?

One thing is certain: the stage is set for an explosive reckoning. With Caitlyn Clark elevating the league, Britney Griner remaining an enigma, and Stephen A. Smith quietly amassing evidence, the next headline could reshape women’s basketball entirely. And for a league that has spent years cultivating a controlled image, this could be the moment that changes everything. The question now isn’t if the WNBA will face scrutiny—but when—and whether it will be able to withstand the storm that’s quietly been brewing for years.

Full video: