Liz Cambage Breaks Silence: WNBA Fired Her to Protect Brittney Griner, Fans Demand the Truth

Liz Cambage, one of the most talented and controversial figures in women’s basketball, is finally speaking out—and what she revealed could shake the WNBA to its core. For years, fans and analysts have speculated about Cambage’s sudden exit from the league, painting it as a self-imposed retirement due to controversy. But according to Liz, that narrative was not just false—it was orchestrated. The WNBA allegedly went to extraordinary lengths to protect Brittney Griner, and in the process, sacrificed one of its brightest stars.

For Cambage, the frustration stems from the consistent misrepresentation of her actions and words. “I don’t understand the media constantly trying to twist the things I say into a negative way when all I want is better for women,” she explained. “I really don’t understand it. I don’t appreciate the lies. Don’t you ever get sick of lying on my name? Like, sheesh. Don’t you have anything else better to talk about?”

Her comments came during a candid and explosive interview with Taylor Rooks for Bleacher Report, where she recounted her experience with the league, the infamous 2021 pre-Olympic incident with the Nigerian national team, and the contractual disputes with the Los Angeles Sparks. According to Cambage, the media narrative that painted her as rogue and controversial was a cover story, created to justify her exit while shielding Griner from scrutiny.

The incident that made headlines involved Cambage allegedly using racial slurs against Nigerian players during a scrimmage ahead of the Olympics. The story spread rapidly on Twitter and across sports platforms, with the public condemning her actions. Cambage, however, vehemently denies ever using slurs. “Well, this one girl that’s been saying that I called them monkeys, n-words, like that’s not—I’ll call you a dumb. That’s what I say to people when we get into it. I don’t really lean towards racially-backed insults. That’s not how I go. I’m very pro-black,” Cambage said.

She went further, challenging anyone to release recordings of the alleged incident. “Leak the tapes. Y’all want to see the truth? Leak the tapes. Everyone in Australia has seen the tape. Still lying about what’s on these tapes. Leak the tapes.” Indeed, videos from that game have surfaced, revealing that the situation was far more complex than the narrative suggested. Cambage insists that she was not the only player involved and that what transpired was a heated game moment rather than the racial attack she was accused of committing.

But this isn’t simply about defending her reputation. Cambage claims that the incident was blown out of proportion deliberately, positioning her as a scapegoat so the WNBA could protect Griner. She alleges that the league’s favoritism towards Griner, despite ongoing controversies about her physical advantages and past behavior, created a system where Cambage’s career became expendable.

The story doesn’t end there. Cambage’s problems with the league began well before the 2021 scrimmage. Her 2022 contract with the Los Angeles Sparks, which promised a $170,000 salary along with perks like a car and housing, turned out to be another trap. She claims that the benefits outlined in her contract were deemed “impermissible” by the WNBA, leaving her without the promised compensation. On top of that, Cambage endured mistreatment from both staff and teammates, facing insults, dismissals of her complaints, and a toxic environment that eventually forced her to terminate her contract mid-season.

“You know, I kept LA as the pinnacle of my dream, even though a lot of people warned me about playing for that club. And, you know, I got to witness it all firsthand. The lies I was told. And I’m so happy I have witnesses to everything I’ve been through,” she said. Cambage’s story paints a picture of a league willing to sideline its own star, ignore her grievances, and manipulate circumstances in order to protect another player.

Fans and analysts have noticed double standards in how the WNBA handles controversial players. Cambage points out that while she faced career-ending scrutiny for incidents on and off the court, Griner often receives minimal consequences for actions that would derail other players’ careers. A striking example occurred when Griner allegedly directed a slur at Caitlin Clark in public, yet the league took no action. Cambage draws parallels between this and her own experience with the Nigerian team, emphasizing that the WNBA appears to protect certain players at the expense of others.

The controversy also raises larger questions about the league’s policies regarding trans and queer athletes. While inclusivity is a stated goal, multiple players have voiced concerns about perceived unfair advantages and sidelining of biological women. Two-time national champion Val Whiting argued, “A lot of my basketball sisters feel differently, but trans women do not belong in women’s sports. It’s not fair nor safe for biological women. There has to be another solution for trans women to compete athletically besides having them compete against biological women.” Cambage’s revelations appear to intersect with these ongoing debates, highlighting inconsistencies in the league’s approach to fairness, equity, and player protection.

The fallout from Cambage’s exit wasn’t just professional—it was deeply personal. Her former teammates reportedly broke down in tears when she left, and fans have been calling for her return ever since. Social media commentary reflects widespread support for Cambage, with users noting that the current WNBA landscape could use the intensity, drama, and talent she brings. “Could you imagine Liz Cambage on a team in today’s WNBA landscape? New fans would not be ready,” wrote one fan. Another added, “Liz is what is missing in the current WNBA roster for that extra tension the league needs. Where is she when you need her?”

Yet despite her talent and the support she receives, Cambage has been unfairly labeled as problematic. She has played for twelve different teams across the WNBA, China, Australia, and Israel, but her frequent moves are scrutinized far more harshly than similar transitions by other players. Fans argue that while Cambage faces backlash for her off-court controversies, players like Griner continue to benefit from the league’s protection, even when facing legal or behavioral issues.

The real question now is how the WNBA could have operated in a way that seemingly protects one player while punishing another. Cambage’s return to the public eye is more than a bid for vindication—it’s a chance to expose the structural inequalities and favoritism that have plagued the league. She isn’t just seeking to return to professional play; she’s preparing to reveal the inner workings of the league, with all the receipts, witnesses, and firsthand accounts necessary to hold those responsible accountable.

As fans and commentators anticipate Cambage’s next moves, the potential ramifications are enormous. Her revelations challenge the integrity of the league, raise ethical questions about the treatment of athletes, and highlight the sometimes toxic mix of PR, favoritism, and player management that can destroy careers. If Cambage’s claims hold weight—and early evidence suggests there is merit to her accusations—the WNBA may be forced to reckon with its decisions and its narrative control.

In the end, Cambage’s story is one of resilience, courage, and a relentless pursuit of justice. While the league may have attempted to silence her, she’s back—and this time, she’s armed with truth and ready to take on a system that once pushed her aside. Whether she returns to the court or not, her revelations have already ignited a conversation that the WNBA can no longer ignore. Heads may roll, policies may be questioned, and fans finally may get the answers they’ve been demanding for years.

Liz Cambage’s saga is far from over. The WNBA might have tried to erase her, but the star who refused to be silenced is making it clear: she’s back, she’s speaking, and the truth is coming. And when it does, the league—and the players who benefited from its favoritism—may never be the same again.

Full video: