Joe Rogan Tears Into Meghan Markle: Fake Tears, Royal Marketing, and Epstein Rumors

Joe Rogan has never been known for pulling his punches, but his latest podcast episode took his trademark bluntness to a new level. This time, the target of his unfiltered criticism was none other than Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex. What began as a conversation about celebrity image and authenticity spiraled into a ruthless takedown of Markle’s tears, her royal title, her business ventures, and even the decades-old yacht girl rumors linking her to Jeffrey Epstein.

It wasn’t a polite discussion. Rogan came in swinging, and the picture he painted was not of a misunderstood duchess trying to heal in the public eye, but of an ambitious actress still milking the monarchy for every ounce of fame, money, and sympathy it can provide.

Crying on Command: The “Fake Tears” Accusation

Rogan’s rant kicked off with a clip of Meghan Markle casually joking about being able to cry on command — treating tears like a party trick rather than an expression of genuine emotion. For Rogan, this was the smoking gun.

“Who does that?” he asked, incredulous. “You’re telling the world how sad and broken you are, and now you’re bragging about fake tears?”

He accused Markle of using emotional breakdowns as calculated tools rather than authentic responses. Every trembling voice, every well-timed deep breath, every glossy-eyed moment wasn’t evidence of fragility, Rogan argued — it was performance. To him, Markle’s emotional displays weren’t healing, they were headlines.

And he wasn’t alone. Rogan cited body language experts who have long suggested that Markle’s interviews look more like rehearsed monologues than spontaneous vulnerability. Her sad eyes, dramatic pauses, and perfectly timed sighs, they argued, seemed more suited for a script than real-life heartbreak.

In Rogan’s words, she wasn’t crying because she was sad. She was crying because it worked.

Titles, Perks, and Hypocrisy

From there, Rogan turned to one of Meghan and Harry’s most controversial choices: continuing to use their royal titles after stepping away from official duties. To Rogan, it was the height of hypocrisy.

He mocked the idea that Meghan and Harry could leave behind the palace, reject their responsibilities, move to California, rake in millions through Netflix and Spotify, and still call themselves the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

“It’s like quitting your job,” Rogan scoffed, “but still demanding the paycheck, the office, and the company car.”

The contradiction, he argued, was glaring. Markle repeatedly described royal life as unbearable, yet still brands herself with the very title that made her famous. According to Rogan, this isn’t independence. It’s royal marketing. The crown she claims to despise is the same crown she continues to wear as a glittering badge of honor whenever it’s convenient.

Critics have echoed this view for years: without the titles and the palace drama, Meghan and Harry’s brand wouldn’t have half the weight it does. The very system they claim to have escaped is still the foundation of their entire empire.

Lifestyle Brands, Netflix Deals, and the Business of Royal Glitter

Rogan didn’t stop at the tears and titles. He dove into Meghan Markle’s business ventures, calling them more style than substance.

Her rebranded lifestyle company — marketed as a sophisticated new era of empowerment — was, according to Rogan, little more than “lawsuit incoming.” Allegations of logo plagiarism surfaced almost immediately, and critics suggested the brand was built on borrowed aesthetics and thin air. Instead of groundbreaking innovation, Rogan argued, Markle simply slapped her name and title on a glossy package and hoped the sparkle of royalty would sell it.

The same went for the Netflix series. Promoted as a must-watch glimpse into Meghan and Harry’s world, Rogan described it as “a beautifully shot snoozefest.” In his eyes, it was less storytelling and more self-promotion, a polished infomercial for brand Sussex. Every frame felt curated, every scene constructed to reinforce the couple’s narrative, with vulnerability and honesty nowhere to be found.

The irony, Rogan pointed out, was glaring: Meghan and Harry’s projects were supposed to represent their independence. Instead, they were just clever ways of cashing in on the very monarchy they supposedly left behind.

The Yacht Girl Rumors: Rogan Goes Nuclear

Just when listeners thought Rogan had reached peak savagery, he lobbed his most controversial grenade: the infamous “yacht girl” rumors.

For years, whispers have circulated online that before her royal fairy tale, Meghan Markle may have attended yacht parties hosted by powerful elites — including those connected to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Photos have circulated, unverified and often debunked, with claims that a young Markle appeared alongside Prince Andrew and other figures of Epstein’s orbit.

Rogan didn’t claim the rumors were fact. But he leaned into them with the kind of knowing smirk that leaves audiences unsettled. He reminded listeners that speculation about Markle’s early career and elite social connections has never fully gone away, and suggested that her rapid rise may have had more to do with powerful alliances than pure talent.

To be clear, no hard evidence ties Markle to Epstein. No flight logs, no official records, no verified meetings. But in the world of celebrity gossip and conspiracy forums, that hasn’t stopped the theories from spreading like wildfire. And by raising it, Rogan ensured the whispers would echo louder than ever.

The Victim Narrative: “It’s All Smoke and Mirrors”

Perhaps the harshest part of Rogan’s critique was reserved for what he called Meghan and Harry’s “perfected victim narrative.”

He argued that the couple has turned every slight — real or perceived — into fuel for their brand. A negative headline becomes proof of persecution. A royal disagreement becomes a trauma to be broadcast. Each public appearance, Rogan suggested, follows the same formula: frame themselves as misunderstood outsiders, sprinkle in emotional performances, and use the fallout to justify another business move.

“They’re not breaking free,” Rogan said. “They’re selling the shadow of the crown, one Netflix deal at a time.”

To him, Meghan and Harry weren’t rebels carving their own path. They were opportunists using victimhood as currency, cashing in on the monarchy while claiming to run from it.

The Debate That Won’t Die

So where does this leave Meghan Markle?

Rogan’s takedown was brutal, but it tapped into frustrations that many critics have voiced for years: the contradictions between Meghan’s words and her actions, the gap between independence and exploitation, the sense that her story is less organic struggle and more careful marketing.

Are the tears genuine? Or are they part of a well-honed performance?
Is she an empowered woman stepping into her own? Or a savvy strategist clinging to royal perks while pretending to reject them?
And the most explosive question of all: are the yacht girl rumors baseless misogynistic gossip, or the shadows of a carefully scrubbed past?

Rogan didn’t provide definitive answers. He didn’t have to. His podcast was less about proving anything and more about poking holes in the carefully crafted narrative that Meghan Markle has built around herself. And whether you love him or hate him, Rogan has a way of forcing conversations people might otherwise avoid.

The Final Word

At the heart of Rogan’s critique is a single, damning accusation: Meghan Markle is less a victim than a master of royal marketing. The crown she claims to despise is the same crown she continues to wear when it suits her. The tears she sheds in interviews may not be pain, but performance. And the businesses she builds aren’t fresh starts, but extensions of a brand propped up by the monarchy she supposedly escaped.

It’s harsh. It’s controversial. And it’s exactly the kind of analysis Rogan is known for.

Whether you see Meghan Markle as a trailblazing woman unfairly maligned by misogynistic media, or as a cunning strategist who knows how to play the game better than anyone else, one thing is clear: her story is far from finished. And with critics like Rogan keeping the spotlight fixed squarely on her, every move she makes will continue to spark debate, speculation, and scandal.

Full video: