Tyler Perry Hit With $260 Million Sexual Assault Lawsuit From Former Actor Amid Netflix Success

Hollywood powerhouse Tyler Perry finds himself at the center of a stormy legal battle, as a former actor from his hit TV show The Oval has filed a $260 million lawsuit accusing the writer and director of sexual assault, workplace harassment, and battery. The timing of the lawsuit has many in the entertainment world raising eyebrows, as Perry is currently promoting his new film Straw, starring Taraji P. Henson, which has already claimed the number one spot on Netflix.

The lawsuit, filed by Derek Dixon, alleges that Perry engaged in multiple instances of sexually inappropriate behavior that began as early as 2019. According to the court documents obtained by TMZ, Dixon claims he met Perry at an event that year, where the director singled him out from the crowd and requested his phone number. Perry allegedly indicated he might have a role for Dixon, and soon afterward, Dixon landed a small role in two episodes of Perry’s show Ruthless.

Dixon alleges that his relationship with Perry took a troubling turn in January 2020 when Perry invited him to his Atlanta home under the guise of building a professional friendship that could lead to further acting opportunities. While Dixon reportedly drank too much that night and slept in a guest bedroom, he claims Perry entered the room and began touching his thighs. Although Dixon says he rejected these advances, the lawsuit claims Perry remained interested and soon began sending sexually suggestive text messages.

The texts, as outlined in the lawsuit, allegedly included Perry asking about Dixon’s sexual preferences and making statements about having sex with men. While Perry has never publicly identified as homosexual, these claims have reignited speculation surrounding his personal life. Dixon also asserts that his character on The Oval, Dale—a gay, homeless, and desperate store clerk—was modeled after Perry’s alleged vision for a real-life sexual partner: someone loyal and dependent. Dixon claims he feared his career would suffer if he directly rejected Perry’s advances, so he reportedly tried to downplay the sexual undertones, claiming he simply was “not the sexual type.”

The alleged incidents continued into late 2020, with Dixon claiming that Perry invited him again to Atlanta, where Perry allegedly initiated a sexually charged conversation and grabbed Dixon by the throat, saying, “Look how excited you just got.” Dixon says he pushed Perry away, ending the encounter. The lawsuit spans years of text messages between the two men, which Dixon claims document numerous sexually explicit advances, including messages stating, “No straight man would be going on walks with you or cooking dinner for you unless they wanted to f you. I would f you.”

Dixon alleges that the most aggressive incident occurred in June 2021, again at Perry’s Atlanta home. According to the lawsuit, Dixon was staying in the guest house wearing only his underwear when Perry reportedly entered, claiming to give him a goodnight hug, then allegedly yanked down his underwear, groped him, and told him to “relax.” Dixon claims he managed to deflect the situation by changing the subject, avoiding further escalation.

After years of alleged harassment, Dixon reportedly filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in June 2024. He later quit The Oval, citing that he could no longer endure the alleged sexual harassment. Dixon is now seeking $260 million in damages from Perry and Tyler Perry Studios, claiming the actions constituted both quid pro quo sexual harassment and workplace sexual assault.

Tyler Perry’s legal team has categorically denied the allegations. Matthew Boyd, Perry’s attorney, told TMZ, “This is an individual who got close to Tyler Perry for what now appears to be nothing more than setting up a scam.” Boyd further stated that Perry is confident the claims are fabricated and will ultimately fail in court.

While Perry’s team denies the allegations, the lawsuit has sparked renewed debate about the blurred lines of professionalism in Hollywood. Many point to the power dynamics at play, particularly when a high-profile director is interacting with a subordinate or aspiring actor. In these situations, allegations of sexual harassment can be complicated, particularly when the accused holds significant influence over the accuser’s career trajectory.

For context, Perry is no stranger to public speculation about his personal life. Over the years, rumors have circulated regarding his sexuality, fueled by high-profile collaborations and his close-knit relationship with cast members. Perry has never publicly confirmed or denied these rumors, and they remain unverified. However, the current lawsuit adds a new layer of scrutiny, particularly given the alleged text messages and reported incidents spanning multiple years.

The timing of the lawsuit has also raised questions. Perry is currently in the midst of a major promotional campaign for Straw, a high-profile Netflix release that has already garnered attention for its box office success and star-studded cast. Critics and fans alike are debating whether the timing of the lawsuit is coincidental or calculated, though legal experts note that filing complaints with the EEOC often precedes formal lawsuits, suggesting a procedural timeline rather than opportunistic timing.

Another point of contention is the alleged text messages. As with many digital communications in legal disputes, verification is a key factor. Laypersons cannot confirm the authenticity of text messages without forensic analysis, which is typically conducted during the discovery phase of a lawsuit. Legal analysts have pointed to similar cases, such as the Diddy trial, where deleted text messages were recovered and authenticated by forensic experts to confirm their origin. In the Perry case, the authenticity of the messages will be a critical element in the courtroom.

The lawsuit also highlights gendered differences in public perception. While high-profile sexual harassment claims involving women often dominate headlines, this case draws attention to the experiences of male actors in Hollywood. Discussions about the case have already sparked a broader dialogue about the unique challenges men may face when alleging sexual misconduct against powerful figures, particularly in industries where professional advancement can be contingent on personal relationships.

Despite the allegations, Perry remains a dominant figure in entertainment, with his recent projects achieving significant commercial success. His Netflix hit Straw is currently topping charts, and Perry continues to be a household name, known for his sprawling studio operations, prolific writing, and groundbreaking contributions to Black cinema and television. However, the lawsuit threatens to cast a shadow over his legacy and raises questions about accountability in an industry where celebrity power can sometimes shield individuals from scrutiny.

Perry’s legal team has maintained a firm stance, dismissing the allegations as a potential “scam” and asserting confidence in a favorable outcome. The case is likely to involve detailed forensic examination, testimony from both parties, and analysis of the alleged text messages and incidents. The legal battle could take months or even years to resolve, depending on pre-trial motions, discovery, and potential settlement discussions.

For his part, Dixon has positioned himself as an actor who attempted to navigate a complex professional landscape, ultimately feeling forced to expose alleged misconduct that he claims spanned multiple years. His lawsuit underscores the challenges faced by performers in Hollywood when power imbalances intersect with personal and professional boundaries. Whether the claims will hold up in court remains to be seen, but the case has already ignited widespread conversation about sexual harassment, professional ethics, and the accountability of influential figures in entertainment.

As of now, Tyler Perry has not made a public statement outside of his attorney’s brief remarks, and no trial date has been set. The entertainment community, fans, and critics alike are watching closely, weighing the credibility of the allegations against Perry’s longstanding reputation as a trailblazer in film and television. The case has also prompted discussions on social media, where viewers are dissecting timelines, comparing experiences, and speculating on potential outcomes.

While legal experts caution against drawing conclusions before all evidence is presented, the case undeniably raises significant questions about conduct behind the scenes in Hollywood. From alleged unwanted advances to sexually suggestive communications and reported physical contact, the lawsuit paints a complex picture of a professional relationship allegedly tainted by coercion and fear.

Ultimately, the Tyler Perry lawsuit serves as a reminder of the power dynamics inherent in Hollywood, the challenges of substantiating claims of sexual misconduct, and the potential consequences for even the most influential figures. Whether Perry will face legal repercussions or successfully defend against these allegations remains uncertain, but the case has already ignited a critical dialogue about the intersection of fame, power, and accountability.

As the story develops, industry insiders and fans alike are keeping a close eye on updates, eager to see whether the lawsuit will proceed to trial or if a settlement might be reached behind closed doors. With $260 million at stake and a high-profile director under scrutiny, the case promises to be one of the most closely watched legal battles in entertainment this year.

Full video: