Blake Lively’s $7 Million Nightmare: The Hollywood Legal War That Just Won’t End

Just when it seemed like the Blake Lively versus Justin Baldoni saga had hit peak chaos, another explosive twist has thrown gasoline on the fire. This time, it’s not Baldoni taking swings at Lively, but a completely new player entering the battlefield: a PR consultant named Jed Wallace. The same man Lively accused of orchestrating a smear campaign against her is now suing her for defamation—to the tune of $7 million.

At first glance, $7 million seems small compared to Baldoni’s jaw-dropping $400 million defamation suit against Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and her PR team. But Wallace’s lawsuit might be even more damaging. Why? Because it goes straight to the heart of one of Lively’s boldest claims—that Baldoni weaponized PR professionals to destroy her reputation. If she can’t prove it, she’s not just fighting Baldoni anymore—she’s trapped herself in another legal nightmare of her own making.

The Spark That Lit the Fire

The feud began after the release of It Ends With Us, the film adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s bestselling novel. Instead of basking in box office glory, the project has turned into a courtroom soap opera that makes the movie’s plot look tame in comparison.

Blake Lively set the drama in motion by accusing Baldoni, who directed and co-starred in the film, of sexual harassment and workplace retaliation. Her lawsuit also alleged that Baldoni launched an online smear campaign, painting her as unstable and difficult to work with.

Baldoni, however, didn’t retreat. He went nuclear. He slapped Lively, Reynolds, and her entire PR team with a $400 million defamation lawsuit—an astronomical figure that sent Hollywood into meltdown.

But the most embarrassing twist came when Baldoni released behind-the-scenes footage that seemed to undercut one of Lively’s most damning claims. In her lawsuit, she described an unsettling incident during a slow-dance scene, where Baldoni allegedly dragged his lips down her neck and whispered, “It smells so good.” Creepy, right?

Except when Baldoni dropped the unedited footage, the narrative flipped. Instead of harassment, the video showed a lighthearted moment on set, with Baldoni joking about makeup and his wife. The so-called “smoking gun” looked more like two actors staying in character. Social media pounced, accusing Lively of fabricating drama.

Suddenly, her credibility was on the ropes.

Enter Jed Wallace: The $7 Million Curveball

As if that wasn’t enough, Lively now faces a brand-new opponent. PR consultant Jed Wallace—the very person she accused of masterminding the smear campaign—is suing her for defamation. Wallace claims he has never even met Lively, let alone worked with Baldoni to tarnish her reputation.

According to Wallace, Lively made reckless, baseless accusations that dragged his name through the mud and cost him millions in lost clients. His lawsuit paints her as someone who went public first, and only after the fact scrambled to find evidence to support her claims.

The kicker? Wallace is only asking for $7 million. Compared to Baldoni’s monster lawsuit, it looks like pocket change, but it could prove far more devastating to Lively’s defense. Why? Because it highlights the possibility that she may have acted without proof—and if a jury believes she defamed an uninvolved third party, her credibility in the Baldoni case could completely collapse.

Did Blake Lively Dig Her Own Grave?

The big question now is simple: Did Lively recklessly name Wallace in her accusations, or is this all part of a bigger game orchestrated by Baldoni’s camp?

Lively’s team insists that Wallace was no neutral party. They claim he worked as a subcontractor for Baldoni and actively helped cover up the truth. In their eyes, Wallace’s lawsuit isn’t about reputation—it’s about silencing Lively and shielding Baldoni from accountability.

But there’s one glaring problem. Reports suggest that Lively quietly withdrew her request to depose Wallace. If she was so certain of his involvement, why back down? Was it a strategic legal move, or a quiet admission that she had no receipts?

The optics aren’t great. Especially when you remember that Lively’s reputation was already taking hits before any lawsuits were filed. During the It Ends With Us promo tour, critics blasted her for dodging the story’s heavy themes of trauma and domestic abuse, instead cracking jokes and treating the movie like a rom-com. Many fans of the book were disappointed, accusing her of trivializing the source material. Was that a smear campaign—or just a PR fumble?

A Battle for Control

Behind all the lawsuits and press leaks, there’s a deeper theme running through this saga: control.

Baldoni alleges that Lively tried to rewrite one of the film’s most pivotal moments, the rooftop scene, which is central to the emotional arc of the story. He allowed her to draft her version but ultimately stuck to the original script. Lively didn’t take it well.

According to Baldoni’s lawsuit, things escalated when he was summoned to a meeting at Lively and Reynolds’ penthouse—where none other than Taylor Swift was waiting. The implication was clear: Hollywood’s most powerful couple and its biggest pop star were united behind Lively. Baldoni interpreted it as an intimidation tactic, a subtle way of saying: “Do what we want, or face the consequences.”

From there, the relationship between the two stars collapsed. Reports of screaming matches, creative clashes, and even weight-shaming allegations flew across the internet. Whether true or exaggerated, the narrative became clear: this wasn’t just about harassment claims. It was about power struggles, bruised egos, and the battle to control both the film and the story surrounding it.

The Court of Public Opinion

In Hollywood scandals, the “court of public opinion” often matters more than the court of law. Lively initially controlled that narrative. Social media piled on Baldoni, branding him creepy and unprofessional. But when he dropped the behind-the-scenes footage, the tide turned almost instantly.

Now, with Wallace suing her and Baldoni producing receipts that directly contradict her claims, Lively’s credibility is under fire. Legal experts like Benjamin Chu, who represented Johnny Depp in his case against Amber Heard, have noted that recorded evidence—like video and text messages—tends to sway juries far more than hearsay. Right now, Baldoni seems to have more of that in his arsenal.

The Subpoena War

Lively’s legal team isn’t backing down. Reports show they’ve subpoenaed Baldoni’s phone records, his publicist, his crisis manager, and even internet service providers like Cloudflare. They want every call, text, and message from the past two years, hoping to uncover proof of a coordinated smear campaign.

Baldoni’s team calls this a desperate fishing expedition. His lead attorney, Bryan Freedman, argues that Lively is grasping at straws, demanding mountains of data in hopes of finding anything to prop up her claims. And he’s not wrong—judges often frown on overreaching subpoenas, especially in civil cases.

Still, if Lively’s team does manage to dig up something incriminating, the balance could shift yet again.

The Bigger Picture

What started as workplace harassment allegations has spiraled into a full-blown Hollywood power struggle. At stake is more than money—it’s reputation, influence, and survival in an industry where image is everything.

For Lively, the risk is enormous. If she can’t back up her claims, she could go from Hollywood’s golden girl to a cautionary tale about reckless accusations. For Baldoni, the fight is about clearing his name and proving he’s not the villain Lively painted him to be.

And for Jed Wallace, the $7 million man caught in the crossfire, this might be about reclaiming a reputation unfairly dragged into a war he says he never wanted.

The Unanswered Questions

As the trial looms, the unanswered questions pile up:

Did Blake Lively really fabricate a smear campaign to excuse bad press?

Was Jed Wallace truly uninvolved, or was he working quietly for Baldoni?

And perhaps the biggest question: will either side actually win, or will both leave Hollywood courtrooms with their reputations permanently scarred?

One thing is certain—this legal war is far from over. With subpoenas flying, footage leaking, and Hollywood power players lurking in the background, the drama surrounding It Ends With Us has become a saga of its own.

And as each twist unfolds, one truth becomes clearer: in Hollywood, the battle for control doesn’t end when the cameras stop rolling.

Full video: