Ryan Reynolds’ SNL Joke Sends Blake Lively’s Carefully Curated Image Crashing Down: A Complete PR Disaster

Blake Lively’s carefully cultivated image of innocence, resilience, and professionalism has just taken a spectacular hit—thanks to her husband, Ryan Reynolds. Known for his sharp wit and sometimes reckless humor, Reynolds recently appeared on Saturday Night Live’s 50th Anniversary special and delivered a joke that shattered months of strategic PR work, leaving Lively scrambling to salvage what remained of her reputation. What was meant to be a high-profile, controlled public appearance turned into a humiliating moment, as Reynolds’ humor collided disastrously with Lively’s ongoing legal and public relations battles.

The saga begins long before the SNL appearance. Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds arrived at the event dressed to impress, with Lively in a breathtaking floral gown and Reynolds in a classic black tuxedo. On the surface, the couple projected calm and control, but their body language suggested otherwise. Lively, in particular, looked tense, aware of the looming legal storm surrounding her and Justin Baldoni’s ongoing disputes. She had every reason to be cautious—after all, her team had spent months carefully managing media narratives about a lawsuit that had made daily headlines.

The SNL disaster unfolded almost immediately. When the host casually asked Reynolds, “Ryan, how’s it going?” the response should have been simple, vague, or diplomatically deflective. Instead, Reynolds chose to joke about the lawsuit. The audience laughed, but the laughter was awkward, a thin veneer over an atmosphere of discomfort and tension. Lively’s expression—daggers aimed at her husband—spoke volumes: if looks could kill, Reynolds would have been history. Telepathically, she seemed to be saying, “You could have just stayed quiet.”

For months, Lively had been presenting herself as a victim of harassment and professional sabotage at the hands of Baldoni. The narrative, supported by her PR team and Reynolds’ occasional public appearances, painted a sympathetic picture: Lively was the wronged party in a complex legal battle. Now, that narrative was in jeopardy. Reynolds’ joke on live television undercut her claims, leaving her to gather the scattered pieces of her carefully curated public image.

Reynolds’ misstep on SNL was not his first. During the promotion of Deadpool, he had leveraged his “Nice Pool” persona to mock Baldoni, turning a character into a caricature that mirrored the director’s personality, preaching feminist ideals and satirizing his perceived toxic masculinity. Reynolds’ sense of humor, though sharp, has a history of alienating colleagues. On the set of Blade: Trinity, Wesley Snipes openly expressed frustration with Reynolds’ constant joking, which he found overbearing and distracting. Likewise, TJ Miller recounted incidents on the set of Deadpool where Reynolds’ humor was cruel and cutting, leaving lasting emotional wounds. These patterns of behavior resurfaced on live television, where Reynolds’ jokes collided with high-stakes litigation, leaving his wife exposed.

The context surrounding Lively’s legal battles with Baldoni is crucial. Since December 2024, she had claimed in court that Baldoni had engaged in repeated harassment, including what she described as “subtle bullying,” targeting her appearance and professional contributions. In one instance, she alleged that Baldoni contacted her personal trainer, suggesting that Lively should lose weight for a scene that never existed. Baldoni’s counterclaims, however, depicted a different story: the request was for safety during a lift scene he intended to perform, which Lively ultimately refused, and he argued that he had been the target of her own subtle bullying and derogatory comments.

These back-and-forths, compounded by public statements and social media campaigns, have created a highly polarized perception of the case. Initially, public sentiment leaned heavily toward Lively, supported by fans, co-stars, and fellow celebrities including Gwyneth Paltrow, Amy Schumer, and Colleen Hoover, author of It Ends With Us, which was adapted into a film starring Lively. Hoover praised Lively for her honesty and resilience, while Lively’s sister, Robin, and former Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants co-stars publicly expressed solidarity. The narrative of Lively as the victim of a calculated campaign of harassment seemed well-established.

However, cracks began to appear. Video footage from the 2022 Forbes Power Women Summit resurfaced, revealing Lively’s insistence on creative control over all aspects of her projects, from costume design to script decisions. Her statements suggested that she often overstepped traditional actor boundaries, demanding authorship to feel fulfilled, which in hindsight contradicted her victim narrative. Combined with the revelations from journalist Kirsty Flah—who recounted a past interview where Lively unintentionally caused personal hurt—the public began to question whether Lively’s “sweetheart” persona was entirely authentic.

The PR landscape became even more treacherous when Baldoni escalated the legal battle, filing a $400 million lawsuit against Lively and Reynolds, citing civil extortion, defamation, and invasion of privacy. His team alleged that Lively and Reynolds disseminated unverified and edited information to the media, attempting to damage his reputation for selfish gain. Baldoni also released a website documenting the timeline of events and sharing text messages, adding further credibility to his claims.

Amidst this chaos, Reynolds’ SNL misstep was a devastating blow. The show was meant to be an opportunity to rebuild public favor, yet his joke reignited online outrage and skepticism. Social media users questioned Lively’s narrative, scrutinized her past interviews, and dissected her behavior during film promotions, including her management of the It Ends With Us press tour, which critics described as overly curated and insensitive to the film’s domestic abuse themes.

Attempts to salvage her reputation, including social media statements highlighting domestic abuse statistics, fell flat. Flah’s revelations and Baldoni’s counterclaims combined with Reynolds’ ill-timed joke created a perfect storm, leaving Lively’s team back at square one. What had been months of meticulous image management—legal filings, media outreach, celebrity endorsements—was undone in a matter of moments on live television.

The episode also underscores a broader pattern in Reynolds’ public behavior. His humor, while often celebrated for its charm and wit, has historically blurred lines between levity and insensitivity. From mocking co-stars to satirizing real-life individuals, Reynolds’ comedic instincts have repeatedly caused friction in professional and personal contexts. On SNL, this pattern manifested at the worst possible moment, jeopardizing his wife’s legal and public standing.

Lively, meanwhile, is left to navigate the fallout. Public perception is fickle, and in the age of social media, a single misstep can erase years of carefully constructed credibility. The SNL incident serves as a cautionary tale: even the most controlled public image can be vulnerable when a spouse, no matter how beloved or talented, acts impulsively on live television.

In conclusion, Blake Lively’s ordeal illustrates the precarious balance between personal reputation, legal strategy, and public perception. Months of careful planning, legal maneuvering, and media management were undermined by a single, poorly judged joke by Ryan Reynolds. The fallout serves as a stark reminder that in the world of celebrity culture, image and narrative are fragile commodities, easily disrupted by humor, miscommunication, or impulsive actions. As Lively and her team regroup, the public—and the media—will be watching closely to see how she navigates this latest chapter of her high-profile life. For now, the SNL debacle remains a glaring example of how quickly fame, influence, and carefully curated public personas can unravel.

Full video: