The video covers two major topics: speculation about a “cancelled” celebrity and an in-depth analysis of the alleged methods used by Ryan Reynolds’ company to obtain evidence for his wife, Blake Lively’s, civil lawsuit.

The “Cancelled” A-Lister Controversy

The host analyzes comments made by actor Glenn Powell on a podcast, where he described a recent event where he met a “recently cancelled” person whose work he admired.

Toxic Face: Powell claimed that when a photographer suggested a photo, he quickly realized the person’s “face is toxic” and that people have a “visceral reaction” to the star due to their bad choices. Powell explicitly avoided taking the picture.
Theories Point to Ryan Reynolds: The video’s host speculates that the celebrity Powell was referring to is Ryan Reynolds, citing evidence of a growing public backlash against him.

Reynolds consistently has to disable comment sections on his social media posts, suggesting widespread negativity.
His close friend, Hugh Jackman, faced significant public criticism and negativity simply for his association and friendship with Reynolds.
Reynolds has seemingly swapped Jackman for his Wrexham partner, Rob McElhenney, bringing him along to promotional events—even for projects McElhenney was not involved in—which is viewed as a calculated PR move.
Reynolds’ promotional tour for his produced documentary is titled “Ryan Reynolds with Friends,” which the host criticizes as being narcissistic and centered entirely on his own image.

The Vanzan “Sham Lawsuit” Allegations

The video details the controversy surrounding the alleged illegal acquisition of evidence for Blake Lively’s civil case (against the Wayfarer party/Justin Baldoni’s team).

The Shell Company: Reynolds’ company, Vanzan (of which he is the CEO), is accused of orchestrating a “sham lawsuit” against 10 anonymous people. This action was reportedly a legal maneuver to subpoena an employee who then handed over the phone of Jennifer Abel.
Targeted Evidence: The alleged purpose was to obtain a key text message in which a member of the opposing party mentioned, “we can bury anyone”—the central piece of evidence for Lively’s case.
Illegal Acquisition Claims: Critics claim the evidence was obtained illegally because:

The lawsuit itself was allegedly a pretext and not filed in good faith.
The text messages were reportedly obtained and shared before the Vanzan lawsuit was even filed.

The Vanzan Deposition Fight: The defense is now attempting to depose a Vanzan representative. Reynolds’ team is fighting to limit the scope of questioning only to the period after the lawsuit was filed, a move the host believes is a deliberate attempt to hide the pre-lawsuit conspiracy that led to the evidence being obtained. The host warns that if the evidence was obtained illegally, it could lead to the collapse of Lively’s entire lawsuit.
Signal Messages: Additionally, Lively’s legal team is demanding access to over 7,500 Signal messages from the defense team, who are fighting the request, citing attorney-client and personal privilege.