Scandal, Luxury, and Legal Drama: The High-Stakes Case Entangling ‘Married to Medicine’ Star Quad Webb.

Quad Webb, the vibrant and quick-witted star of Bravo’s “Married to Medicine,” is no stranger to drama. Her sharp tongue, bold style, and ability to keep things classy have made her a fan favorite on reality TV.

But this time, the drama swirling around Quad isn’t playing out on television screens—it’s unfolding in real life, in a high-profile legal battle involving her on-and-off boyfriend, a missing Rolls-Royce worth over $300,000, and a tangled web of accusations, admissions, and unanswered questions.

The Spark: A Rolls-Royce Goes Missing

The story begins with King, Quad’s boyfriend, who found himself at the center of a luxury car scandal. It all started when King ended up in possession of a 2021 Rolls-Royce Cullinan, a vehicle that’s as much a status symbol as it is a car.

This particular Rolls-Royce, valued at more than $300,000, was not King’s to have. He received it from Clinton Curry, a man who didn’t actually own the car—he had leased it from a dealership.

Here’s where the trouble began: Curry, lacking legal ownership, handed the car over to King as if it were his to give away.

Legally, you can’t sell or gift something you don’t own. When the leasing company discovered their luxury vehicle was missing and in someone else’s hands, they didn’t see a misunderstanding—they saw theft.

Social Media and Self-Incrimination

The situation escalated when King, seemingly unfazed, drove the Rolls-Royce around town and posted photos of himself with the car on social media, presenting it as his own.

But the real twist came when King, confronted with the facts, admitted in writing that he did not have permission to use or keep the car.

This written confession turned what could have been a murky “he said, she said” dispute into a clear-cut case, giving the real owners all the evidence they needed to take King to court.

The Courtroom: Legal Fees and Mounting Costs

By March 25th, the case had landed in the courtroom, and things were getting serious for King. The battle was no longer just about returning the missing car—it was about money, lots of it.

Beth Rogers, the attorney for the leasing company, presented a detailed affidavit showing the immense effort involved in tracking down the car, investigating the disappearance, attending hearings, and holding King accountable.

Her legal work tallied up to an eye-popping 293.2 hours at a rate of $550 per hour. The result?

Legal fees alone soared to $160,000—before even considering the vehicle’s value or additional damages. And with court fees, interest, and potential liens on King’s property, the financial fallout could grow even larger.

Public Record and Reputation at Stake

Because this is a civil case in Fulton County Superior Court, every messy detail is available to the public. Employers, brands, business partners, and fans can all access the records with a simple search.

For Quad, whose fame comes from her reality TV persona, this means the legal drama is now part of her public narrative—even if her name doesn’t appear directly in every court document.

The Expanding Cast: More Than Just King

As the legal proceedings continued, the investigation widened. Not only was King implicated, but so were Clinton Curry Sr. and Clinton Curry Jr., suggesting a family connection and a broader web of involvement.

The case evolved from a simple dispute over a car to allegations of civil conspiracy, where multiple people are accused of working together—knowingly or unknowingly—to possess and transfer a vehicle they had no legal right to.

One of the most mysterious figures in the case is Janique Harris, named in court documents as the last person seen with the Rolls-Royce before it vanished. According to her account, she was intoxicated, left the keys in the car, and simply walked away.

The court found this explanation unconvincing, given the car’s extraordinary value and the implausibility of abandoning such a luxury vehicle. Since then, Harris has remained silent, her whereabouts unknown, adding a layer of intrigue to an already complex case.

Intentional Misconduct and Serious Consequences

The judge in the case didn’t mince words, labeling King’s actions as “intentional misconduct.” That’s not just legal jargon—it means the court believes King knowingly did something wrong, not by accident or misunderstanding, but by deliberate choice.

This finding carries severe legal consequences, potentially exposing King (and others) to both civil and criminal liability.

The Fallout for Quad

While Quad Webb’s direct involvement remains unclear, her name is now tied to the lawsuit and the public conversation. The burning question: Did Quad know what was happening, or is she an innocent bystander caught in her partner’s mess?

Court documents don’t provide a definitive answer, but her association with King and the scandal could impact her reputation and career, regardless of her actual role.

If Quad was unaware of the scheme, she might emerge with her image intact. But if evidence surfaces that she knew more than she’s let on, the consequences could be long-lasting—affecting not just her public persona but also her professional opportunities and personal relationships.

What’s Next? A Case Far from Over

As of now, the $160,000 in legal fees is just the tip of the iceberg. The court has yet to determine the final judgment, which could include the value of the missing Rolls-Royce, additional damages, interest, and recovery costs. The total amount could easily climb into the hundreds of thousands, if not more.

With multiple parties implicated, a missing luxury vehicle, and an elusive witness, this case is anything but straightforward.

The legal team continues to investigate, and the final outcome remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the stakes are incredibly high for everyone involved.

The Bigger Picture: Lessons and Lingering Questions

This isn’t just another reality TV scandal—it’s a cautionary tale about the risks of associating with the wrong people and the consequences of poor decisions. The story raises important questions about trust, accountability, and the price of fame.

Did Quad know the full extent of King’s actions? Is she a victim of circumstance, or did she play a role, however small, in the unfolding drama? Only time—and the ongoing legal proceedings—will tell.

For now, the world watches as this high-stakes legal drama unfolds, waiting for answers, a final judgment, and perhaps, closure for all involved.

One thing is certain: when the final gavel falls, the impact will be felt far beyond the courtroom, reverberating through the lives and reputations of everyone in its path.